— by Hannah Lee
In the same way that I love cookbooks with a narrative — more memoir than instructional manual — I found reading The Chinese Way to Wealth and Prosperity pleasurable in that I learned much about the culture of my own people. The author is my brother, Michael Lee, and he sent me an early copy. The fact that we grew up together does not preclude our separate areas of experiences, with him being an expert in finance, a world traveler, and a former student of martial arts. This book is clearly and concisely written with the lay reader in mind. Speaking as an elder sister, I’m finally realizing that there is much I can learn from my baby brother.
More after the jump.
In our economy, who would want to learn about getting rich slowly? However, the financial crisis of this country is mostly attributable to the “get-rich-quick” mindset of many Americans. Here’s Michael’s remedy for this malaise: utilize the human capital that is in each and every one of us and apply his eight time-tested strategies for achieving financial success. There are no short cuts and you have to learn to defer gratification.
In the Introduction, Michael retells the allegory attributed to the founder of Temple University, the preacher Russell Conwell:
a prosperous farmer who desires diamonds so badly that he sells everything he owns and runs off to find his fortune. After a lifetime of trying, he dies without having achieved his goal. Meanwhile, the person who purchased his house discovered a rich diamond mine on the very property that was sold. The searching man would have found his diamonds if, instead of seeking his fortune elsewhere, he had dug in his own backyard. He would have found his “Acres of Diamonds,” as Russell Conwell entitled his work. [p.4]
Being a preacher, Conwell must have been familiar with the Bible, but I wonder if he knew about the parable that Jews tell about the Jew from Lublin who dreams of a treasure near the Imperial Palace in Prague and journeys to seek it. He meets a soldier there who tells of his own dream of treasure under a humble Jew’s floor in Lublin and scoffed at his likelihood of success, whereupon the Jew returns home, digs under his floorboards, and unearths his treasure. The point of both stories is to draw upon our inner resources, our innate human capital. Michael wrote this book to show others that they too can apply these culturally based principles that have served the Chinese so well, both in their homeland as in the diaspora.
One illustrative chapter is the one on “Obtain “Kung Fu” in Education,” in which Michael extolls the Chinese value of education. In January 2011, Amy Chua published a provocative piece in the Wall Street Journal, “Why Chinese Mothers are Superior,” (giving advance guard to her book, Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother) and sparked a public debate about parenting styles. Around the same time, an international study was also published, which is of far greater significance.
The OECD, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a major nongovernment institution based in Paris, released the latest results in its influential Programme for International Student Assessment study. This triennial study assessed the reading, science, and math skills of 15-year-olds from public schools in all 34 OECD member states, as well as in a host of other nations. The results were not encouraging for U.S. taxpayers and must have been very disappointing for the U.S. Department of Education.
That’s because in these OECD rankings, the United States, the world’s most economically dynamic and prosperous country by far, could rank no higher than thirty-first in the world in mathematics. This dismal showing for American mathematical skills has by now become repetitious and expected. But to me, there was a slightly surprising outcome in the science rankings, in which the United States finished twenty-third. Imagine, the powerful United States, home to the mightly MIT and Cal Tech, ranked essentially in the high minor leagues in the science scorecard.
…The list of the top 10 countries for all subject matters was striking in its composition. The city of Shanghai took first place, while South Korea took second, Hong Kong fourth, Singapore fifth, and Japan eighth. [pp.10-12]
These places all owe a cultural legacy to Confucius (Kong Zi), the “Teacher of 10,000 generations.” His teachings form a “complete moral philosophy for leading a proper life,” a belief system “in a right and wrong way to live and provides for the governance of human relations on earth.” Furthermore, “Confucianism may be unique in its exclusive focus on becoming “good.” In place of a deity, liturgy, or intrinsic forms of worship, there is the teaching of obtaining virtue, and only that. This is known as Confucian moral self-cultivation.”
The earth-shattering moment occurred to me when I read: “the main reason why education holds the esteemed position it does in the Chinese and Confucian societies is that education provides the very and sole means of becoming fully human. Education for its own sake just doesn’t cut it.” Equally compelling for me was when Michael calls for a return to civic education, for building an institutional movement toward the creation of “good” people.
Also interesting to me, Michael points out the common fallacy in equating kung fu with martial arts. Kung fu actually means “mastery,” while wushu better describes what Americans think of as martial arts. Furthermore,
some in martial arts circles believe the word shifu to be the equivalent of the word sensei in Japanese…But there’s a word of difference between the two words. Sensei means simply “teacher”…shifu refers to one who has mastered something. Almost anything would be included– art, painting, physics, engineering…To be linguistically correct, one does not know kung fu; one has kung fu. [pp.23-25]
I cannot give away the secrets of this tightly constructed book, so I urge you to get your own copy. You’ll learn some crucial principles for financial health and you’ll have a ball learning about the Chinese people and its culture.
Your Loss, Their Gain
How much income have you given up for the top 1 percent?
This is the last of a seven part series of 11 charts by Dave Gilson and Carolyn Perot courtesy of Mother Jones. We will be reprinting a selection every 24 hours this week. For more cutting edge journalism from Mother Jones, please sign up for their free newsletter at motherjones.
For a healthy few, it’s getting better all the time.
This is the fifth of a series of 11 charts by Dave Gilson and Carolyn Perot courtesy of Mother Jones. We will be reprinting a selection every 24 hours this week. For more cutting edge journalism from Mother Jones, please sign up for their free newsletter at motherjones.
Why Washington is closer to Wall Street than Main Street.
|Member||Max. Est. Net Worth|
|Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA)||$451.1 million|
|Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA)||$435.4 million|
|Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL)||$366.2 million|
|Sen. John Kerry (D-MA)||$294.9 million|
|Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO)||$285.1 million|
|Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA)||$283.1 million|
|Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WIj)||$231.2 million|
|Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX)||$201.5 million|
|Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)||$136.2 million|
|Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)||$108.1 million|
|Combined Net Worth||$2.8 Billion|
This is the fourth of a series of 11 charts by Dave Gilson and Carolyn Perot courtesy of Mother Jones. We will be reprinting a selection every 24 hours this week. For more cutting edge journalism from Mother Jones, please sign up for their free newsletter at motherjones.com/newsletter.
Out of Balance
A Harvard business professor and a behavioral economist recently asked more than 5,000 Americans how they thought wealth is distributed in the United States. Most thought that it’s more balanced than it actually is. Asked to choose their ideal distribution of wealth, 92% picked one that was even more equitable.
Source: Michael Norton and Dan Ariely
This is the third of a series of 11 charts by Dave Gilson and Carolyn Perot courtesy of Mother Jones. We will be reprinting a selection every 24 hours this week. For more cutting edge journalism from Mother Jones, please sign up for their free newsletter at motherjones.com/newsletter.
Winners Take All
The superrich have grabbed the bulk of the past three decades’ gains.
This is the second of a series of 11 charts by Dave Gilson and Carolyn Perot courtesy of Mother Jones. We will be reprinting a selection every 24 hours this week. For more cutting edge journalism from Mother Jones, please sign up for their free newsletter at motherjones.com/newsletter.
How Rich are the Super Rich?
A huge share of the nation’s economic growth over the past 30 years has gone to the top one-hundredth of one percent, who now make an average of $27 million per household. The average income for the bottom 90 percent of us? $31,244.
This is the first of a series of 11 charts by Dave Gilson and Carolyn Perot courtesy of Mother Jones. We will be reprinting a selection every 24 hours this week. For more cutting edge journalism from Mother Jones, please sign up for their free newsletter at motherjones.com/newsletter.
Note: The 2007 data (the most current) doesn’t reflect the impact of the housing market crash. In 2007, the bottom 60% of Americans had 65% of their net worth tied up in their homes. The top 1%, in contrast, had just 10%. The housing crisis has no doubt further swelled the share of total net worth held by the superrich.
Income Distribution: Emmanuel Saez
Net worth: Edward Wolff