Separate Fact from Fiction of Obama’s Israel Record


— by Jason Attermann

Pro-Israel activist Steve Sheffey wrote an opinion piece for The Jerusalem Post warning about the false smears likely to be spread by right-wingers against President Barack Obama’s strong pro-Israel record as the presidential campaign heats up.

The campaign to delegitimize President Obama in the eyes of pro-Israel voters will only intensify between now and November 6….

Opponents of territorial compromise and Americans who use concern for Israel to mask concern about paying their fair share of taxes compose most of the 20-25 percent of Jews who vote Republican. But that’s not enough to win an election; hence their efforts to distort President Obama’s record on Israel. Most Jews support the Democratic domestic agenda, so if there is no reason to oppose the president based on Israel, there is no reason to oppose him at all.

Obama has called for the removal of Syrian President Bashar Assad, ordered the successful assassination of Osama bin-Laden, done more than any other president to stop Iran’s illicit nuclear program, restored Israel’s qualitative military edge after years of erosion under the previous administration, increased security assistance to Israel to record levels, boycotted Durban II and Durban III, taken US Israel military and intelligence cooperation to unprecedented levels, cast his only veto in the UN against the one-sided anti-Israel Security Council resolution, opposed the Goldstone Report, stood with Israel against the Gaza flotilla, and is mounting a diplomatic crusade against the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state.

More after the jump.
According to Sheffey, Obama’s detractors will attempt to delegitimize his extensive commitment to Israel’s security through the techniques of “repetition of falsehoods,” “baseless speculation,” and “guilt by association”-all of which have been engaged in before. Sheffey simplifies the situation as merely one of separating the facts of Obama’s actions from the fiction perpetuated by his opponents:

President Obama has surrounded himself with pro-Israel advisers, from Hillary Clinton to Dan Shapiro to Joe Biden to Rahm Emanuel. Yet we still hear about alleged influences from Obama’s past. Obama has been president for nearly three years. Evaluate President Obama the way the pro- Israel community has always evaluated our leaders and representatives: by looking at what they’ve done, not by trying to read their minds or via conjectures about influences that are impossible to prove or disprove.

If unprecedented military cooperation between the US and Israel, unambiguous opposition to a unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state, and unrelenting defense of Israel in international forums is what happens when someone knows Jeremiah Wright, we ought to send all our candidates to his church. President Obama’s record proves that he is one of the best friends of Israel ever to occupy the White House. The only question is whether attempts to manipulate the emotions of pro-Israel voters by distorting the president’s record will succeed. The answer depends on our ability to separate fact from fiction.

President Obama: Pro-Israel at the Two-Year Mark

— Steve Sheffey

After two years, it is clear that none of the flights of fancy imagined by our Republican friends about President Barack Obama’s fitness for office have come to pass. Obama’s record after two years in office is outstanding from a pro-Israel perspective.

Obama has provided more security assistance to Israel than any president in history, he’s created an unprecedented level of military cooperation between the United States and Israel, and most important, he’s done more than any other president to thwart Iran’s illicit nuclear ambitions.  Thanks to Obama, Iran is now further away from acquiring nuclear weapons than it was when he took office.

We can disagree with Obama on specific polices or tactics, as we have with every president, but we don’t do the U.S.-Israel relationship any favors when we question Obama’s commitment to Israel for continuing American policies that have been in place for decades.

News reports from just the last week are enough to dispel any lingering doubts:

The New York Times reported on January 15 that a joint American and Israeli effort to undermine Iran’s efforts to make an atomic bomb through the Stuxnet computer worm has wiped out a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges and significantly delayed Iran’s nuclear efforts.

The Wall Street Journal reported on January 8 that Israel’s outgoing intelligence chief said that Iran won’t be able to build a nuclear weapon until 2015 and that many credit international sanctions that have restricted Iran’s ability to procure key raw materials.

Ha’aretz reported on January 13 that in a combative exchange with an Al-Jazeera reporter in Doha, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that “Israel is a sovereign country and it makes its own decisions…You often make decisions based on your own experiences and history. And when the Israelis pulled out of Lebanon they got Hezbollah and 40,000 rockets and when they pulled out of Gaza they got Hamas and 20,000 rockets.” That’s Clinton speaking to Al-Jazeera, not staunch supporters of Israel.

The Jerusalem Post reported on January 9 that the Palestinian Authority is complaining that the United States has threatened to veto a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlement activity. The Obama administration has been very clear that the UN “is not the place to resolve the long-standing conflict and outstanding issues between the Israelis and the Palestinians. [The Obama Administration does] not think that that is a productive path for the Palestinians or anyone to pursue.”

The Washington Times reported on January 12 that the Obama administration is ramping up the war on terror, doubling special operations, doubling the use of unmanned drones, and expanding counter-terrorism operations.

And that was all in one week. Let’s look at the past two years: Obama fulfilled his campaign promise to boycott Durban II. Obama renewed sanctions against Syria several times. Obama fully funded the Arrow 3 ballistic missile system and the Iron Dome system. Obama provided more security assistance to Israel than any president in history. Obama maintained the U.S. policy of ambiguity on Israel’s nuclear weapons. Obama told the Arab world in Cairo that America’s bond with Israel is “unbreakable.” Obama re-approved loan guarantees to Israel.

Obama has repeatedly condemned Palestinian incitement against Israel and attempts to delegitimize Israel. In late November 2010, the State Department responded to the Palestinian Authority’s denial that the Western Wall was Jewish by saying that “We strongly condemn these comments and fully reject them as factually incorrect, insensitive and highly provocative. We have repeatedly raised with the Palestinian Authority leadership the need to consistently combat all forms of de-legitimization of Israel including denying historic Jewish connections to the land.”

Obama pulled out of joint exercises with Turkey after Turkey excluded Israel. Obama repealed import tariffs on Israeli dairy products. Obama restored Israel’s qualitative military edge and took U.S. military cooperation to unprecedented levels after erosion during the Bush administration.

As Daniel Shapiro, President Obama’s Senior Director for the Middle East and North Africa National Security Council, explained on May 3, 2010:

This commitment to Israel’s security is not a slogan for us.  We live it every day in the policies we carry out.  Since taking office, President Obama has taken what was already a strong U.S.-Israel defense relationship, and broadened and deepened it across the board.  Our annual military assistance to Israel has increased to nearly $3 billion.  We have reinvigorated defense cooperation, including on missile defense, highlighted by the 1,000 U.S. service members who traveled to Israel to participate in the Juniper Cobra military exercises last fall.  We have intensive dialogues and exchanges with Israel – in political, military, and intelligence channels – on regional security issues and counter-terrorism, from which we both benefit, and which enable us to coordinate our strategies whenever possible.  We have redoubled our efforts to ensure Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge in the region, which has been publicly recognized and appreciated by numerous senior Israeli security officials.  And we continue to support the development of Israeli missile defense systems, such as Arrow and David’s Sling, to upgrade Patriot missile defense systems first deployed during the Gulf War, and to work cooperatively with Israel on an advanced radar system to provide early warning of incoming missiles.

The ties between our defense establishments are extraordinary.  Throughout the U.S. military and the IDF, from Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen and IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, down to generals, colonels, and majors in every branch, personal relationships have been forged, joint work is being done, and a sense of common purpose and shared mission animates the partnership.

We take these steps because the threats Israel faces are real, and because many of the same forces threaten us and our interests.  Whether it is an Iran bent on acquiring nuclear weapons, Hezbollah acquiring increasingly sophisticated weaponry from Syria, or Hamas smuggling weapons through the tunnels into Gaza, Israelis stand on the front lines, often at great cost, against forces that seek to take the Middle East in a lawless, dangerous, and unstable direction, putting our interests at risk.  When President Obama wrote recently that “our alliance with Israel serves our national security interests”, and that “no wedge will be driven between us”, this is what he was talking about.

President Obama has also steadfastly defended Israel against attempts to de-legitimize it, whether at the UN or other international bodies, while always standing up for Israel’s right to self-defense against terrorism and other threats.   These are commitments that will not change.  When it became clear that the Durban II Conference would unfairly and unreasonably single out Israel for criticism, we did not hesitate to pull out of the conference and lead many of our allies to do the same.  We have repeatedly and vigorously voted against and spoken out against the Goldstone Report.  When Turkey summarily cancelled Israel’s participation in a key military exercise last fall, we did not hesitate for one minute to pull out as well, and we have worked diligently to preserve a positive relationship between Israel and Turkey, which has been an important contributor to security in the region.

Dennis Ross provides additional detail here.

There’s one thing that Israel’s enemies and Obama’s critics have in common: an unrelenting, almost monomaniacal focus on Israel’s settlement policy. For better or worse, Obama has maintained the same policy on settlements that the United States has maintained since 1967. Unless we’re prepared to label every president since 1967 as unsympathetic to Israel, we should not single out President Obama.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu noted on November 9 that the “disagreements with the US over Jerusalem are well-known. They are not new and have continued for 40 years.” These differences are apparently not well-known to those who would use Israel for partisan purposes to advance the political fortunes of the Republican Party, but those of us who genuinely care about peace in the Middle East and a strong US-Israel relationship should stress that this is and has been American policy, and is not unique to any one president.

The Bush administration also publicly opposed settlements and building in Jerusalem. Not only that, but the Bush administration demanded that the ban on settlement growth include “natural growth” in its roadmap for peace. Every Democratic and Republican president since 1967 has failed to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 requires that the U.S. embassy be moved to Jerusalem unless the president signs a waiver every six months, which is just what Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama (thus far) have done.

Mark Twain said that “a lie can make it half way around the world before the truth puts its pants on.” One cannot help but wonder if some of Obama’s critics have taken it upon themselves to prove it. Space does not permit a refutation of all the falsehoods circulating about Obama, but two that will likely surface again and again are the mythical snub of Netanyahu by Obama at the White House and non-existent statements by Obama that Israel’s legitimacy rests on the Holocaust.

The myth of Obama’s snub of Netanyahu was manufactured by those seeking to create a rift between the two leaders. Read more here and here.

Obama never referred to 60 years of “occupation,” he never equated suffering during the Holocaust to Palestinian suffering, and he never said that Israel’s legitimacy is grounded in the Holocaust. Read the proof here.

Here’s what Obama did say: Obama went to Cairo and told the Arab and Muslim world that America’s bond with Israel is “unbreakable.” He told the Arab and Muslim world, a world rife with Holocaust denial, that to deny the Holocaust is “baseless, ignorant, and hateful.” He told them that threatening Israel with destruction is “deeply wrong.” He said that “Palestinians must abandon violence” and that “it is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus.” And he said that “Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, and recognize Israel’s right to exist.”

Who knows where we’d be today if previous Presidents had had the courage to personally deliver this message on Arab soil.

History will deliver the final verdict on Obama once he’s completed his second term. But if the case went to the jury now, the verdict would be clear: Obama is a strong friend of Israel, and he’s proven it in word and deed.